Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?

["Felipe Sere" <dodofxp@xxxxxxxxx>]

I honestly see no reason why QT and KDE is needed on the ISO.
Provide bashburn and be happy. I think sticking to the "NO-QT" and
"NO-BLOAT" philosophy is more important than providing k3b.

On 10/15/07, Sebastian Reisse <sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seeing this line at the snapshot changelog shocked me:
>
>
> [xap] Added k3b-1.0.3-i486-50.1.tgz (replaces gnomebaker)
>
> I guess this is because of gnomebaker is not supporting cdrkit but
> that's no reason to go for KDE bloated stuff!
>
> If only k3b supports cdrkit I would say we eighter forget about cdrkit
> and stick cdrtools and gnomebaker (or any other gtk-based app) or if you
> really want to replace cdrtools with cdrkit making gnomebaker and other
> frontends unusable than provide no gui burning tool but some scripts for
> the console or maybe bashburn.
>
> The reason why one will choose ZW is because it is tiny, fast and runs
> on older Hardware as well and (like in my case) because it is 100% KDE
> and qt free!
>
> By implementing k3b you will break with the qt free tradition in ZW and
> you add unneccesary bloat to the ISO! JP, why is that? Are you on drugs? ;)
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Sebastian Reisse
>
> E-Mail: sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx
> ICQ:    38670797
> Jabber: seb2@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> powered by
>        __   _
>       / /  (_) __  __ ____  __
>      / /__/ // _ \/ // /\ \/ /
> GNU /____/_//_//_/\___/ /_/\_\
>
>
>


-- 
Felipe Sere