Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?

[Jean-Philippe Guillemin <jp.guillemin@xxxxxxx>]

Felipe Sere wrote:
> I honestly see no reason why QT and KDE is needed on the ISO.
> Provide bashburn and be happy. I think sticking to the "NO-QT" and
> "NO-BLOAT" philosophy is more important than providing k3b.
>   

Thanks for your comment.

However, this has been decided and is the main roadmap point for Zenwalk 
5.0.

You will have to live with it

JP

> On 10/15/07, Sebastian Reisse <sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
> > Hi,
> >
> > seeing this line at the snapshot changelog shocked me:
> >
> >
> > [xap] Added k3b-1.0.3-i486-50.1.tgz (replaces gnomebaker)
> >
> > I guess this is because of gnomebaker is not supporting cdrkit but
> > that's no reason to go for KDE bloated stuff!
> >
> > If only k3b supports cdrkit I would say we eighter forget about cdrkit
> > and stick cdrtools and gnomebaker (or any other gtk-based app) or if you
> > really want to replace cdrtools with cdrkit making gnomebaker and other
> > frontends unusable than provide no gui burning tool but some scripts for
> > the console or maybe bashburn.
> >
> > The reason why one will choose ZW is because it is tiny, fast and runs
> > on older Hardware as well and (like in my case) because it is 100% KDE
> > and qt free!
> >
> > By implementing k3b you will break with the qt free tradition in ZW and
> > you add unneccesary bloat to the ISO! JP, why is that? Are you on drugs? ;)
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Reisse
> >
> > E-Mail: sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx
> > ICQ:    38670797
> > Jabber: seb2@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > powered by
> >        __   _
> >       / /  (_) __  __ ____  __
> >      / /__/ // _ \/ // /\ \/ /
> > GNU /____/_//_//_/\___/ /_/\_\
> >
> >
> >
> >     
>
>
>