MHonArc test archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?
- To: zenwalk-main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?
- From: "Michael Verret" <axxium.zenlnx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:45:50 -0500
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
- Delivered-to: zenwalk-main@lists.zenwalk.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=V1eDgq/jqqnUAa452sJamy0oouxMyXg33t/nufH22Ks=; b=quF7FFFl7sgTuo4QAcNiKQ1f83kGSh0Vs51QsXvwCQxm/evCIk9LQPgw7EOHoNjQIRVLgP8DaRhxwEZkNKQ/sWK2G8dubE2em3IbVtW5wOxWBBwAHqIXRTwElyDBy24wd6WLlEBVkBX6Pxg7fYZk61AZSQrLLQcSC0T2emOdQdA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qUEKryr2gJIQDRbta+GkKtsuVB149NUozQOBWmot9Ap81WWIYQ8cz24ADe03gWfyLzbiNlmFxAlF4zUMvf8+YaEJOxZMOhzcJQ4wqBAQ26zHm3zVoVXlhEElw0N28msaDHL6sPJZN3pxoHcfHTlSTmdPU+xVRnld2zHYuoPuXgs=
Honestly after Teran and Zeqadious quit JP really started implementing
some of the devs/users ideas. Regardless of your preferences in
software I see him being really open-minded and willing to experiment
atm. Just give it some time and let's see where he's going with it.
Snapshot right after a release gets really wild for a bit. Remember
GRUB and Xorg-7? Some changes make the cut and some do not.
:)
Michael
On 10/15/07, Sebastian Reisse <sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi JP,
>
>
> Jean-Philippe Guillemin schrieb:
> > Felipe Sere wrote:
> >> I honestly see no reason why QT and KDE is needed on the ISO.
> >> Provide bashburn and be happy. I think sticking to the "NO-QT" and
> >> "NO-BLOAT" philosophy is more important than providing k3b.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for your comment.
> >
> > However, this has been decided and is the main roadmap point for Zenwalk
> > 5.0.
> >
> > You will have to live with it
> >
> > JP
>
> I also think Felipe is right!
> And to be honest, your way to comment on his statement shows your
> attitude which is not the first time the reason that some good devs and
> dedicated zenwalkers leaved the project.
> I think you should read Teran's mail again describing why he left ZW and
> Zenserver behind. It's basically becase you, JP, are not willing to
> discuss issues with the community trying to find the best solution for
> _ALL_.
>
>
>
> Sebastian Reisse
>
> E-Mail: sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx
> ICQ: 38670797
> Jabber: seb2@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> powered by
> __ _
> / / (_) __ __ ____ __
> / /__/ // _ \/ // /\ \/ /
> GNU /____/_//_//_/\___/ /_/\_\
>
>
>
--
-Michael
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index