Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?

[Sebastian Reisse <sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx>]

Felipe Sere schrieb:
> On 10/15/07, Jean-Philippe Guillemin <jp.guillemin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> However, this has been decided and is the main roadmap point for Zenwalk
>> 5.0.
> Without getting my ass kicked by the French army, when "has [this]
> been decided"?
> I dont remember any voting or discussion? Did I miss it?
> Can we still stick to the 400MB ISO? I honestly dont mind downloading
> all the stuff we are adding, as long as it sticks to the 400MB...
> 

Well in order to maintain the 400MB ISO size JP has to kick off some
other apps out of the iso to make the bloaded KDE/qt stuff fitting on
the ISO. Woult it that be worth? If ZW apps would be mainly based on qt
like in Slack this is understandable but not if the KDE/qt stuff is
added just for ONE application.
This is really bad. And K3B, and all other KDE/qt-based apps are _NOT_
what one would call tiny and optimized for less ressource systems.


Sebastian Reisse

E-Mail: sebastian.j.reisse@xxxxxxx
ICQ:    38670797
Jabber: seb2@xxxxxxxxxxx

powered by
       __   _
      / /  (_) __  __ ____  __
     / /__/ // _ \/ // /\ \/ /
GNU /____/_//_//_/\___/ /_/\_\