MHonArc test archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?
- To: zenwalk-main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?
- From: Gérard Monpontet <gerard.monpontet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:39:16 +0200
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
- Delivered-to: zenwalk-main@lists.zenwalk.org
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.7
Le Monday 15 October 2007 21:55:21 Sebastian Reisse, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
>
> seeing this line at the snapshot changelog shocked me:
>
>
> [xap] Added k3b-1.0.3-i486-50.1.tgz (replaces gnomebaker)
>
> I guess this is because of gnomebaker is not supporting cdrkit but
> that's no reason to go for KDE bloated stuff!
Hi Sebastian,
I think there was quite a good reason, is k3b
Simply the best application for burning on cd
Linux and better maintained, whether you like it or not. ;)
Gérard
>
> If only k3b supports cdrkit I would say we eighter forget about cdrkit
> and stick cdrtools and gnomebaker (or any other gtk-based app) or if you
> really want to replace cdrtools with cdrkit making gnomebaker and other
> frontends unusable than provide no gui burning tool but some scripts for
> the console or maybe bashburn.
>
> The reason why one will choose ZW is because it is tiny, fast and runs
> on older Hardware as well and (like in my case) because it is 100% KDE
> and qt free!
>
> By implementing k3b you will break with the qt free tradition in ZW and
> you add unneccesary bloat to the ISO! JP, why is that? Are you on drugs? ;)
>
> Best regards,
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index