Re: k3b replaces gnomebaker?

["Felipe Sere" <dodofxp@xxxxxxxxx>]

so does this mean we might get more and more KDE apps on the ISO?
I havent tested k3b but now I will... This is probably a good step
forward if we can improve the overall distro, as in: more better
packages, even if they are KDE, not only one single KDE app.

On 10/16/07, GÃrard Monpontet <gerard.monpontet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le Monday 15 October 2007 21:55:21 Sebastian Reisse, vous avez Ãcrit:
> > Hi,
> >
> > seeing this line at the snapshot changelog shocked me:
> >
> >
> > [xap] Added k3b-1.0.3-i486-50.1.tgz (replaces gnomebaker)
> >
> > I guess this is because of gnomebaker is not supporting cdrkit but
> > that's no reason to go for KDE bloated stuff!
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I think there was quite a good reason, is k3b
>  Simply the best application for burning on cd
>  Linux and better maintained, whether you like it or not. ;)
>
> GÃrard
>
> >
> > If only k3b supports cdrkit I would say we eighter forget about cdrkit
> > and stick cdrtools and gnomebaker (or any other gtk-based app) or if you
> > really want to replace cdrtools with cdrkit making gnomebaker and other
> > frontends unusable than provide no gui burning tool but some scripts for
> > the console or maybe bashburn.
> >
> > The reason why one will choose ZW is because it is tiny, fast and runs
> > on older Hardware as well and (like in my case) because it is 100% KDE
> > and qt free!
> >
> > By implementing k3b you will break with the qt free tradition in ZW and
> > you add unneccesary bloat to the ISO! JP, why is that? Are you on drugs? ;)
> >
> > Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Felipe Sere