Re: unmet dependencies

[Monpontet Gérard <monpontet.gerard@xxxxxxx>]

Le Saturday 20 September 2008 14:42:40 jp.guillemin, vous avez écrit :
> BandiPat wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 September 2008, Monpontet Gérard wrote:
> >>> Thanks Gérard, I thought something of this nature had shown up
> >>> before and those files were included in another package, but I
> >>> could not remember which one.  Would it be better to have separate
> >>> packages, as does Slackware, for programs that look for these,
> >>> rather than build them in?
> >>>
> >>> Pat
> >>
> >> I agree with you, but JP, does not agree ;)
>

Ok, JP, perhaps we will see for Zenwalk 5.6. ;)


> You can do like you want, as long as it works, and doesn't break systems
> while upgrading :)
>
> JP
>
> >> Gérard
> >
> > -------------------
> > Ok, no problem, just thought if programs depend on them, it would be a
> > help to eliminate problems like this.  Most all other distros use
> > separate packages, from what I can see, so thought it might be a good
> > idea for Zenwalk also.  I just took a look at previous builds of
> > evince, but the deps are not in those.  Guess they were just missed
> > this time or he had separate packages on his machine.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pat