On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:43 PM,
<jp.guillemin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
After some thinkings... I have to say :
I really think that it's a pity that someone so involved in the project leaves us.
For me, this project has always been a "technical" thing (I met some friends, it's great, but not the main goal). That's why, despite Georges's weekly trolls, I never asked him to leave : he was a very active contributor, and it's enough for me.
For this same reason : it would be ok if he want to join back the team : FOR ZENWALK (not for me). I would even try to forget what he wrote about me, and maybe he could forget what I wrote.
We can have different opinions, we can have different friends, but we have only one project.
JP
----- "Aymeric" <ejisneos@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> I also think that the recent troll he made recently about ZPM was not
> a
> wise way to ask improvements for netpkg. But in the end, that's what
> happened, because the discussion ended with that question.
>
> The only thing that makes me doubt about Zenwalk is how much the team
> is
> considered. JP said that the work in extra wasn't unimportant, and I
> hope so, because the reason why I provided all those music packages
> is
> that I believe in such a powerful distro. And I think that's why many
> other extra packagers provided the packages they like.
>
> Despite his sometimes disturbing attitude, George was among the ones
> who
> really cared about what happened in extra and helped carefully the
> newcomers. He's not the only one, but extra lost one pillar of it's
> development.
>
> I'm saying all this because I'm considering taking some of his extra
> packages over, but I need to be sure I won't add them to my (already
> long) list for nothing (the fact that he maintained those
> dependancies
> was really comfortable).
>
>
> Michael Verret さんは書きました:
> > Let me just say this. After having a day to think about it I also
> > remember not wanting him to join either. it is not a matter of being
> a
> > mean-spirited a matter of being a mean-spirited person. Just think
> > about this scenario for a second...
> >
> > Suddenly you are the lead on a major software project. You have two
> > new people to pick from. Contributor A and contributor B. Both
> people
> > are hard workers but contributor B likes to say things that cause
> > tension within the team. Now as a leader who would you choose?
> >
> > Regardless of how hard George worked and how good a friend he was,
> he
> > was unable to think of what was best for the team. His words have
> now
> > caused doubt in many people. If he never was allowed to join this
> > could have been prevented.
> >
> > To anyone that has doubt about JP please know that JP truly is a
> great
> > leader. JP's only fault was allowing contributor "B" George to
> join.
> >
> > On 5/18/09, Aymeric <ejisneos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> jp.guillemin さんは書きました:
> >>
> >>> -> Please keep in mind that the difference between the Zenwalk
> >>> "GNU-Linux based desktop operating system" and other "Linux
> >>> distributions" is that Zenwalk doesn't aim to be a
> "distribution".
> >>>
> >> does that mean that Zenwalk was not meant to grow that big? So all
> this
> >> work in extra is not that important for Zenwalk (I mean you,
> because
> >> you're the project leader)?
> >>
> >> Like many others, I was really sad about gapan's departure.
> According to
> >> his list of packages, he had an important role in Zenwalk's
> progress,
> >> especially in extra. But such a radical departure means that all
> this
> >> work and the time he spent helping users and packagers was not
> that
> >> important for Zenwalk.
> >>
> >> It seems that the work in extra was done for nothing, in the end.
> It's
> >> sad that Zenwalk doesn't seem to be proud of the team work it
> created,
> >> if what finally counts is the ISO part.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >